Saturday 27 October 2012

Report



Introduction

I set out to research the Byzantine Empire and its libraries, giving an insight to what types of libraries they retained and any major changes, I endeavoured to keep the blog in chronological order. The deadline of one post per week over the past six weeks has been fulfilled using authoritative content. The main focus of this blog is concerning Constantinople, regarding its manuscripts and libraries, rather than the history of the Byzantine Empire. Through this report I shall give an understanding to the following points with an analysis on each post;  

  • Why there was no Great Library of Constantinople
  • The Imperial Library of Constantinople
  • Change of writing style, uppercase to lowercase
  • The destruction of books in the Fourth Crusade 1204 CE
  • What happened to the manuscripts at The fall of Constantinople 1453 CE


Why there was no Great Public Library of Constantinople

Virgin and Child flanked by Justinian I and Constantine I
Mosaic in Aghia Sophia


Above is a mosaic in Aghia Sophia (meaning Divine wisdom) which was a  church in Constantinople, being the largest church in the world when it was built. Emperor Justinian (left) is holding Aghia Sophia which he built during his reign and is offering it to the Madonna and Christ. Emperor Constantine (right) is offering the city he built (Constantinople) to them.  


Constantine the Great moved the capital Rome to the New Rome, where Europe and Asia meet Constantinople (330 CE).  In Constantinople one would assume that there would be a need for a great public library, similar to the twenty eight public libraries of Rome between 1 CE and 300 CE.

The Eastern Empire had adopted Christianity as its official religion and with all the classical literature and pagan writings before that time the assumption is that there would have existed a great public library but there seems to be no trace of one at all.

Staikos (2000) indicates there were four main reasons for this;
Murray (2009) agrees with these statements.
  1.       There was a slump in business of the Roman bookselling and publishing houses that marketed books throughout the Roman Empire. The production and distribution of Christian books was never taken over by the pagan copying and publishing firms. Authors would instead copy their books and issue them to friends and associates. Thus denying the old system of publishers and distributors as more educated classes turned to Christianity it lead to the end of the book trade to the public. The majority of books produced were from the Imperial or the monastic writing rooms (libraries) and none of them had dealings with the general public.

  2.       The church’s attempts to impose its Christian belief system to the population and control the distribution of pagan writings including classical learning and any challenge to Christian theological works would be banned. The Eastern empire adopts Christianity in 334 CE, one would have thought that with writings both Christian and pagan this would have a roaring book trade. This was not the case as with fanatical Christians would not stand for pagans and from the year 340 CE saw the start of the persecution of the pagans and finally the closing of the Athenian philosophy schools in 529 CE. During Emperor Justinian’s reign in 390 CE he would punish any church that did not adhere with the strict belief system.

  3.       The rise in the cost of books caused by the higher cost of parchment and the extraordinary costs associated with paying copyists. The books that were produced in Byzantium were in the form of codices and up until the Seventh Century   were usually written on Egyptian papyrus after the loss of Egypt to the Arabs the importing of papyrus came to an end. Parchment was introduced as a writing medium in the Fourth Century as it lasted longer, papyrus would deteriorate over a period of time but the expense of such material was very high.

  4.       The negative stance of many monks regarding the possession of books; it was felt by many monks and hermits that ownership of books was conflicting to their belief of their vow with poverty. and The Canons of the Apostles (4th CE) was ‘Shun all pagan books’.
During the Byzantine Empire hundreds of thousands of codices were produced for monastic libraries. The large libraries were, the imperial and church related libraries. Private libraries were very small containing only up to thirty books and no great public libraries such as the ones during antiquity existed.

Lerner (1999) indicates that there was a school founded by Constantine and a public library was attached, it contained 120,000 volumes and received imperial support. 

Analysis / Key Issues

Here we identify that there is no great public library as we have known about in antiquity and can clearly understand that the manuscripts of the Byzantium were theological any challenge to Christian texts would not be tolerated. The book trade had dropped and due to the Arabs annexing Egypt in the Seventh Century papyrus would not be used, instead parchment took its place. We see the state changing into a fanatical Christian empire, and the manuscripts of the period are reflective to this.






The Imperial Library of Constantinople


Above is a clip that shows how the British library is digitizing Hellenic manuscripts so we can view them around the world, what a  terrific initiative.

The Imperial Library of Constantinople, (Wedgeworth 1993) indicates that  information regarding the library is uncertain for the reason of fires, political change and earthquakes. There is hardly any archaeological evidence of the library. The only evidence we have is from a few writers in the past, (Staikos 2000) agrees with this view. What the  library collection held is debatable and who was allowed access to the manuscripts is unclear.

The Imperial library was founded in 353CE and may have held 100,000 volumes the largest collection of that period, most of which was destroyed by a fire in 472CE. There are references to higher studies in the 6th and 7th centuries but it is unclear what the collection was. 

The Patriarch of Constantinople in the years 607-610CE built a library in his palace which subsequently burnt down in 870CE.

Benedictine- like copying began in 789 in the Constantinople abbey, meaning there were scribes who would copy theological texts and starting sending them westward into Europe.

The library of Patriarch Photius (b810-d893) leads us to believe that men and women of   privilege had the opportunity to read from the library what is unclear is if they were allowed to borrow or how they obtained the books. One of the items held at the library was Stobaeus’ Encyclopaedia that was divided into four books consisting of 208 chapters. It listed philosophers such as Aristotle and Euclid poets such as Homer and Sappho. Physicians Hippocrates, and historian Thucydides.

Analysis / Key Issues

There is hardly and proof regarding the Imperial Library, only that it existed what is held there is debatable and who could use the library is unclear. There is a report that there were over 100,000 manuscripts and in later years there were only 40,000 this may appear as they were keeping less records, this is not the case the 120,000 were papyrus scrolls, the 40,000 being codices.


Change of writing style , from Capitals to lowercase

Trebizond Gospels, Title page of St John's Gospel, Walters Manuscript W.531, fol. 175r
St Johns Gospel written in lowercase


A major change occurred around the end of the eighth century in Hellenic script as (Staikos 2000) informs us. Manuscripts previous to the end of the eighth century were written in capitals. From this point of time we see the use of lower script, the change allowed the writers to be more efficient as they were able to write more on each page with the reduced size of the text. Punctuation marks and the dividing of words which was rare up to this point, made it easier to read and understand what was written. During the ninth century this process becomes standard practice and  most manuscripts are recopied in the lower case format, (Encyclopaedia Britannica 1980) agrees.


Happy St. Cyril of Jerusalem Day!
St Cyril
Analysis / Key Issues

I found it a challenge to find information regarding the change in style from uppercase to lower case, in authoritative resources. After a great deal of time reading through websites that I have not listed for they cannot be regarded as more than some persons opinion on a subject .  I anticipated that with such a great revolution in writing at the time, a more in depth study of why and when the change happened would have surfaced in the materials I was reading.
My idea was to locate information regarding why at the end of the eighth century did they alter their script to lowercase. Why not before?  Who authorized it? Did Arabic writing have an influence? Was there a connection with St Cyril (pictured above) a Byzantine who at the same period in time the creator of the Slavic alphabet which is based on the Hellenic alphabet. I could not trace any resource that would create a link.



The destruction of books in the Fourth Crusade 1204 CE


Basilica di San Marco, original horses of St. Mark
Four Horses of St Marks Venice



The Fourth Crusade in 1204 CE is marked as a point in time when we have historical evidence that supports the destruction of books by the crusaders. Their intentions were to recapture Jerusalem from Muslim control, but after amassing a great debt in Venice, plans changed and they decided to capture Constantinople.

As (Murray 2009) indicates, the city of Constantinople was captured and ransacked by the crusaders in 1204 CE during this period of time the crusaders considered Orthodox religious books heretical, monasteries and libraries were looted, they would strip the rich covers and bindings and would destroy the books.

The reason that the Christians of the west would consider the eastern Christian books heretical is that in 1054 CE Christianity was divided in two groups, the East were the Orthodox Christians and in the West there were Catholic Christians (the great schism). Each side considered themselves to be the correct path of Christianity and the other to be heretical. (Polastron 2007) specifies that the Franks who were part of the crusade had no time for scribes and scholars. At the end of their spears they had inkpots and sheets of paper that they would parade in the streets. As the Greek historian Nicetas says “ignorant folk who were so openly illiterate and barbaric." Villerhardoin states “Splendid palaces full of ancient art works and classical manuscripts were annihilated.” Even Saladin who captured Jerusalem for the Muslims seventeen years earlier acted more decently.

Analysis / Key Issues

Ever wondered where the Horses of St Marks in Venice came from? The bronze statues were part of the ransacking of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade (pictured above). From what I discovered regarding this point in time is that the Fourth Crusade appears to be the destruction of property including books and the looting of valuable items. The crusaders remained in Constantinople from 1204-1261 CE when they were finally cast out.


What happened to the manuscripts at The fall of Constantinople 1453 CE

Hagia Sophia
Aghia Sophia

As (Encyclopaedia Britannica 1980) indicates The Byzantine Empire lasted from 330CE - 1453 CE, during this time we had the Christians of the west (Fourth Crusade) conquer Constantinople from 1204 CE till they were cast out in 1261 CE. The final blow came in 1453 CE when the Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople, and the Byzantine Empire came to an end.

(Polastron) points out that Constantinople fell on May 29, 1453 to the Ottoman Turks, and that more than one hundred and twenty thousand manuscripts are said to have disappeared. The city had held out the Turks for eight weeks after capturing the city, the Turks went on a rampage of killing and destroying  the city for three days. The Turks differed from the Crusaders of 1204 CE who had no regard for books, they allowed  carts of books to be transported throughout Asia and Europe. After the sacking of Constantinople it is said that ‘Mehmed II al-Fatih (Ottoman ruler) earned his nickname the Conqueror and lost his reputation as a poet,  feebly  attempted to reassemble some Greek and Latin manuscripts that escaped the disaster, which (so he said) he would have rather avoided,’  the official reporter Critobulus  states.

(Staikos) state that ‘more than a thousand Byzantine codices were taken to Italy, mostly from Constantinople, between the beginning of the fifteenth century and the Turkish conquest.’

Other sources indicate that the books were being copied and translated into Arabic and other languages therefore most of the important manuscripts had already migrated throughout Europe and the Arabic world before Constantinople fell.

Analysis / Key Issues

We are certain that Benedictine- like copying began in 789 in the Constantinople abbey, meaning there were scribes who would copy theological texts and started sending them westward into Europe. From the evidence we have all the important texts had already been translated and spread into Europe and the Arabic world pre 1453 CE.


Conclusion

There is a small amount of authoritative content written on the Byzantine Libraries in Constantinople the writing is very limited and intertwined with the history of the Byzantium Empire. I had consulted with reference librarians both in person and remote, which provided me with resources, I also consulted Library Link Victoria, numerous catalogues and utilised the Caval card at Monash University for a monograph.
This empire changes over a millennium until its end in 1453. I was able to touch upon; 
  • How they had no great public library and the impact of Christianity on written material.  
  • The imperial library though we are unclear of its holdings and who had access to the library. 
  • The change of writing style from uppercase to lowercase there was no link as to why at this point in time it occurred.
  • The devastation to books during the Fourth Crusade. 
  • The fall of Constantinople and the impact on manuscripts. 
For further reading I would suggest the subject of Iconoclasm, did it have an impact on the writings of the eighth century?



Wedgeworth, R (ed.) 1993, World Encyclopedia of library and information service,3rd edn, USA.
Staikos, K 2000, The great libraries: from antiquity to the renaissance, Oak Knoll Press, Delaware.
Lerner, F 1999, The story of libraries; from the invention of writing to the computer age, The Continuum Publishing Company, New York.
Encyclopaedia Britannica 1980
Omniglot the online encyclopedia of writing systems & languages, Greek alphabet, viewed 21 October 2012, <http://omniglot.com/writing/greek.htm>
Murray, SAP 2009, The library: an illustrated history, Skyhorse Publishing, New York.
Polastron, LX 2007, Books on fire: the tumultuous story of the world’s great libraries, Thames and Hudson, London.


Wednesday 24 October 2012

What happened to the manuscripts at The Fall of Constantinople?




Hagia Sophia
Aghia Sophia

As (Encyclopaedia Britannica 1980) indicates The Byzantine Empire lasted from 330CE - 1453 CE, during this time we had the Christians of the west (Fourth Crusade) conquer Constantinople from 1204 CE till they were cast out in 1261 CE. The final blow came in 1453 CE when the Ottoman Turks captured Constantinople, and the Byzantine Empire came to an end.
(Polastron) points out that Constantinople fell on May 29, 1453 to the Ottoman Turks, and that more than one hundred and twenty thousand manuscripts are said to have disappeared. The city had held out the Turks for eight weeks after capturing the city, the Turks went on a rampage of killing and destroying  the city for three days. The Turks differed from the Crusaders of 1204 CE who had no regard for books, they allowed  carts of books to be transported throughout Asia and Europe. After the sacking of Constantinople it is said that ‘Mehmed II al-Fatih (Ottoman ruler) earned his nickname the Conqueror and lost his reputation as a poet,  feebly  attempted to reassemble some Greek and Latin manuscripts that escaped the disaster, which (so he said) he would have rather avoided,’  the official reporter Critobulus  states.
(Staikos) state that ‘more than a thousand Byzantine codices were taken to Italy, mostly from Constantinople, between the beginning of the fifteenth century and the Turkish conquest.’
Other sources indicate that the books were being copied and translated into Arabic and other languages therefore most of the important manuscripts had already migrated throughout Europe and the Arabic world before Constantinople fell.
In the post I have found it simple to locate information on the fall of Constantinople, there is an array of resources available online and at the library. The main issue was to link this with manuscripts or libraries of the Byzantine era, this is where difficulties arose as I was left using only three resources that I could rely on that would have authoritative information. The fall of Constantinople is a rather distressful point in time as many lives were lost and with new technology such as the canon, impenetrable walls of the past were suddenly broken down. If I were to be writing on the Fall of the Constantinople it would have been simple to locate an abundance of resources, as I am writing regarding libraries and manuscripts this becomes rather difficult.


Staikos, K 2000, The great libraries: from antiquity to the renaissance, Oak Knoll Press, Delaware.
Encyclopaedia Britannica 1980
Polastron, LX 2007, Books on fire: the tumultuous story of the world’s great libraries, Thames and Hudson, London.

Friday 19 October 2012

The destruction of books in the Fourth Crusade

Basilica di San Marco, original horses of St. Mark
Four Horses of St Marks Venice



The Fourth Crusade in 1204 CE is marked as a point in time when we have historical evidence that supports the destruction of books by the crusaders. Their intentions were to recapture Jerusalem from Muslim control, but after amassing a great debt in Venice, plans changed and they decided to capture Constantinople.

As (Murray 2009) indicates, the city of Constantinople was captured and ransacked by the crusaders in 1204 CE during this period of time the crusaders considered Orthodox religious books heretical, monasteries and libraries were looted, they would strip the rich covers and bindings and would destroy the books.

The reason that the Christians of the west would consider the eastern Christian books heretical is that in 1054 CE Christianity was divided in two groups, the East were the Orthodox Christians and in the West there were Catholic Christians (the great schism). Each side considered themselves to be the correct path of Christianity and the other to be heretical. (Polastron 2007) specifies that the Franks who were part of the crusade had no time for scribes and scholars. At the end of their spears they had inkpots and sheets of paper that they would parade in the streets. As the Greek historian Nicetas says “ignorant folk who were so openly illiterate and barbaric." Villerhardoin states “Splendid palaces full of ancient art works and classical manuscripts were annihilated.” Even Saladin who captured Jerusalem for the Muslims seventeen years earlier acted more decently.

(Staikos 2000) agrees with (Palatsron 2007) and reveals that many books were destroyed and used for fuelling fireplaces, those that survived were stripped and their valuable bindings were taken to St Mark’s in Venice which can be seen there today. Michael Choniates (c. 1138-1222) a book lover and later Archbishop of Athens wrote regarding the crusaders "A donkey would be more likely to appreciate the sound of the lyre, or a perfume jar the fragrance of the unguent, than those men to appreciate the delights of harmony and words.”

Ever wondered where the Horses of St Marks in Venice came from? The bronze statues were part of the ransacking of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade (pictured above). From what I discovered regarding this point in time is that the Fourth Crusade appears to be the destruction of property including books and the looting of valuable items. The crusaders remained in Constantinople from 1204-1261 CE when they were finally cast out. I located three monographs regarding the Fourth Crusade, I found that I was required to add some historical insight to the blog as the authors assume that you are acquainted with the schism of the Christian church, Saladin and the Fourth Crusade. I was again unable to locate a vast amount of  information in regard to this topic.


Murray, SAP 2009, The library: an illustrated history, Skyhorse Publishing, New York.
Polastron, LX 2007, Books on fire: the tumultuous story of the world’s great libraries, Thames and Hudson, London.
Staikos, K 2000, The great libraries: from antiquity to the renaissance, Oak Knoll Press, Delaware.

Tuesday 16 October 2012

Change of writing style

Trebizond Gospels, Title page of St John's Gospel, Walters Manuscript W.531, fol. 175r
St Johns Gospel written in lowercase



The Greek alphabet has been around since approximately 750 BCE according to (Omniglot) it was developed from the Canaanite/Phoenician alphabet.  Over the centuries it changed and became more standardised, local areas had their versions of the Greek alphabet. The direction of the writing was horizontal lines either left to right or alternating right to left, in approximately 500 BCE the direction standardised and became lines left to right in horizontal lines.
A major change occurred around the end of the eighth century in Hellenic script as (Staikos 2000) informs us. Manuscripts previous to the end of the eighth century were written in capitals. From this point of time we see the use of lower script, the change allowed the writers to be more efficient as they were able to write more on each page with the reduced size of the text. Punctuation marks and the dividing of words which was rare up to this point, made it easier to read and understand what was written. During the ninth century this process becomes standard practice and  most manuscripts are recopied in the lower case format, (Encyclopaedia Britannica 1980) agrees.
I found it tough to find information regarding the change in style from uppercase to lower case, in authoritative resources. It led me to write about the origins of the Hellenic alphabet, something I did not have in mind when I started to write the post. After a great deal of time reading through websites that I have not listed for they cannot be regarded as more than some persons opinion on a subject .  I would have thought that with such a great revolution in writing at the time, a more in depth study of why the change happened and when it did would have surfaced in the materials I was reading. It felt as though I was putting in a lot of time on this post with little to present.

Happy St. Cyril of Jerusalem Day!
St Cyril
My idea was to locate information regarding why at the end of the eighth century did they alter their script to lowercase. Why not before?  Who authorized it? Did Arabic writing have an influence? Was there a connection with St Cyril (pictured above) a Byzantine who at the same period in time created the Slavic alphabet which is based on the Hellenic alphabet. I could not trace any resource that would create a link.
During this post I also found it difficult to locate pictures on Flickr that I would be able to use on the blog. The tags that are being used aren't necessarily correct and without having some prior knowledge to what Hellenic text should look like it would have been quite easy to post a picture of a manuscript that was either written in Latin or Aramaic. The picture above although it is in lowercase script is probably not the best example of efficient use of a page though it was the best example in creative commons on Flickr.

Staikos, K 2000, The great libraries: from antiquity to the renaissance, Oak Knoll Press, Delaware.
Encyclopaedia Britannica 1980
Omniglot the online encyclopedia of writing systems & languages, Greek alphabet, viewed 21 October 2012, <http://omniglot.com/writing/greek.htm>